Login   Sign Up 



 

Vaccinated

by butterfly2000 

Posted: 23 February 2011
Word Count: 130
Summary: ...when frustration at life takes you over


Font Size
 


Printable Version
Print Double spaced


It’s an information generation
too distracted to mistrust
the multi-media battlefield of news
contin-
u-
ally
thrust

into a population overfull on ennui
and lost to lust

hostages of subtle terrorism
government issued journalism

dumbed-down into escapism

Big Brother entertains as surveillance spies
the whites of our eyes
in digital definition
micro-vision

before pressing the button that ejaculates
bio-logic
-ally spreading seed

and chemically enhanced
computer-aided
disease

inoculating us against desires of sedition
and ensuring a smooth transition
to the condition of submission

while we’re all tested
for an allergy
to life

force-fed entertainment by intensive means
training our brains by touching screens, as
docu-soap mock-u-mentories diminish intelligence genes

and gaming’s coffers growing fat
on the brains they’re shrinking

as we are slowly vaccinated

against the pandemic of
thin-
king






Favourite this work Favourite This Author


Comments by other Members



James Graham at 15:34 on 24 February 2011  Report this post
I like the tone of this. You’re dealing with serious stuff here, the stuff of political theory: the media foster passivity in society, neutralise dissent and revolt, and are a means of social control; ‘information’, which should be fodder for critical thought, is massive in quantity but seems to undermine thought; and the technological means of disseminating information are more important than the information itself. That’s how I understand the ideas behind your poem - but tell me if I’m wrong. The point I’m making really is that you turn this heavy stuff into a very accessible poem.

Word play helps the tone:

docu-soap mock-u-mentories diminish intelligence genes


- this is what poets are for, to describe these tedious telly creations - and all the many sources of ‘ennui’ - in lively language. There are other examples in the poem. Rhyme also helps - though this is a free-verse poem, there’s an almost jingling rhyme (middle as well as end rhyme) which carries the poem along. It adds up to a light, witty touch that would surely win readers over.

I’d put a question mark over the word ‘disease’. It’s a little hard to follow the sense of the lines

...surveillance spies
the whites of our eyes
in digital definition
micro-vision

before pressing the button that ejaculates
bio-logic
-ally spreading seed

and chemically enhanced
computer-aided
disease

inoculating us against desires of sedition


partly due to this word and partly the way the lines read as a sentence. It seems to say surveillance does two things: it ‘spies’, and then it presses a button that releases ‘disease’. Of course surveillance spies on us; but how does it do the other thing? I wonder if it would be better to separate thes two ideas grammatically:

surveillance spies
the whites of our eyes
in digital definition
micro-vision

Ejaculations
of bio-logic
-ally spreading seed

and chemically enhanced
computer-aided
disease

inoculate us against desires of sedition


Then you have ‘disease inoculating us’. I would have thought some sort of drug would inoculate, rather than disease. Maybe something like

and chemically enhanced
computer-aided
sedatives

inoculate us against desires of sedition


would make better sense. There are other choices - narcotics, dope, or old-fashioned words like nostrum or physic.

Let me know what you think.

James.

butterfly2000 at 10:57 on 28 February 2011  Report this post
Hi James! And thank you!

Yes, you have it all there in your first paragraph ;0) The stanza that begins 'surveillance spies, the whites of our eyes' uses 'spies' as both noun and verb - as I liked the way this sounds when spoken, rather than

surveillance spies spy the whites of our eyes before pressing the button...'

This has been written more with performance in mind - and mixing things up grammatically, for me, added it's own dynamic which I liked. But I suppose it's all up for debate! I can see where you are coming from though and liked your suggestion for that part.

The next point raised about use of 'disease' - again, I can see your point - but in this case, the disease IS the drug being used. In the same way that people can be addicted to what makes them feel bad... it then becomes the drug that 'inoculate's' (a sardonic irony perhaps)...

I also liked using the acronym for computer aided design (CAD) - though it might look better on paper if I set it out as

'chemically enhanced
Computer Aided Dis-ease'

Did you read it out loud? Just wondering if it does work better that way...

Thanks again for your thoughts, it's great getting such constructive feedback. It may seem funny, but I struggle to get words out, especially when trying to crystallise my thoughts... there's always this slight fog that get's in the way. So I'm never quick to respond - not the world's best 'off-the-cuffer' for sure! LOL

Best wishes
Debra







James Graham at 19:20 on 02 March 2011  Report this post
Hi Debra - No, it didn't occur to me to read it aloud, though it should have. I see now (or rather hear) that it's a performance poem. Not being highly computer literate I didn't get CAD, but I'm sure most people would get it. So 'disease' is best here, not what I suggested. Reading aloud, you could have a minute pause in 'Computer Aided Dis...ease' so that the audience would expect 'design' but get something else instead.

I still have a slight problem with 'spies' as both noun and verb, though. Would this perhaps be lost on an audience? Of course, the only way to be sure is to try it out!

James.



SarahT at 21:44 on 02 March 2011  Report this post
Hi Debra,

On the subject of reading aloud, this is definitely a performance poem. For me the words that were broken across several lines didn't really make sense unless I 'heard' them in my head as ways to accentuate a reading, if that makes sense. And I've read it out a couple of times and haven't been able to improve on reading it as a performance piece. But, this does render the CAD reference a little redundant. I do understand the acronym but I'm just not sure that the design nature fits the subject of the rest of the poem, which is all about, as James listed: 'the stuff of political theory: the media foster passivity in society, neutralise dissent and revolt, and are a means of social control'. And it would definitely be lost in a reading. So save that thought until you can make it more in something else, perhaps.

Are you aiming for any particular event with this?

S

SarahT at 21:46 on 02 March 2011  Report this post
Just to add, I didn't really make it explicit but I think it works very well as a performance piece - just in case you were in doubt.

FelixBenson at 12:56 on 04 March 2011  Report this post
I like this too, Debra, it's very satisfying to read out loud. I'd be interested to hear if you get the chance to perform it anywhere - it really cracks along!

butterfly2000 at 11:35 on 06 March 2011  Report this post
Thanks again James and thanks to you both Sarah and Kirsty! You've all given me things to think about, which is always good ;0) I haven't given the poem an airing in public yet, but will try it out on a local writers group when they next have a meeting... there's also the Brewhouse Theatre here in Taunton that a local poetry group hold 'Cafe's' at - I've only read once before - and that was about a year ago, so things are a bit overdue... LOL

best wishes
Debra


To post comments you need to become a member. If you are already a member, please log in .

 






Other work by butterfly2000:      ...view all work by butterfly2000